[mpeg-OTspec] Suggestion for minor correction on figure styles

[Levantovsky, Vladimir]

Just to clarify things - the suggested changes in any way affect feature functionality or layout engine behavior - they are either bug fixes or simply additional language intended to clarify things.

This is why I do not consider them an amendment in a true ISO sense of the word, and they can be implemented by corrigendum (which is good for us because we have one under ballot right now, and it's not too late to make a comment if we believe the bug fix is necessary).

Regards,
Vlad


From: thomas.phinney at gmail.com [mailto:thomas.phinney at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Phinney
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:08 PM
To: Levantovsky, Vladimir
Cc: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] Suggestion for minor correction on figure styles

Yes, that is a good additional amendment, IMO.

T
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotypeimaging.com<mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotypeimaging.com>> wrote:
Thank you, Thomas.

All, I would like to ask you to review this proposal and see if this is something we can reach a consensus on. We do have few more days for ballot comments to be submitted (until March 30), and we can make this proposal a part of the ballot comments to be included in the current draft corrigendum.

On the subject of the proposed amended text - I also noticed that the UI suggestion section for 'lnum' feature recommends that "This feature should be inactive by default." while the UI suggestion for 'onum' is silent about feature default state. Should we also include the recommendation that the 'onum' feature should be inactive by default? This question about unidentified default state was also asked on the W3C CSS mailing list.

Thank you,
Vladimir


From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com<mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com> [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com<mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Thomas Phinney
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:50 PM
To: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com<mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [mpeg-OTspec] Suggestion for minor correction on figure styles