[mpeg-OTspec] RE: Proposed changes to the OFF specification

[Chris Lilley]

On Thursday, July 21, 2011, 10:37:59 AM, suzuki wrote:

st> Dear Michelle,

st> I (personally) think Panose 2.0 is something like yet-another
st> Panose restructured from scratch, and it is not so easy to
st> extend existing Panose 1.0 implementation to support both of
st> Panose 1.0 & 2.0 seamlessly.

I agree. Also, its not clear how complete the Panose 2 work is.

st>  I guess Chris Lilley mentioned
st> Panose 2.0 for the ownership and the license info, and he is
st> not proposing to use Panose 2.0 in future OpenType, at present.

Yes, exactly. 


-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups