FW: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: Proposed changes to the OFF specification

Michelle Perham mihill at microsoft.com
Fri Jul 22 22:53:36 CEST 2011

According to Greg, yes, there is a risk of these problems. What we don't know is how many of these fonts exist.


From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Hudson
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 10:36 AM
Cc: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: FW: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: Proposed changes to the OFF specification

I am aware of some fonts using what Greg labels Panose 1.5 values in the
OS/2 table. Am I correct in thinking that there is a risk of these being
misinterpreted or, in case of values out of range of Panose 1.0, ignored
or causing problems?



Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com<http://www.tiro.com>
Gulf Islands, BC tiro at tiro.com<mailto:tiro%40tiro.com>

You may quote to me, render to Caesar the things that
are Caesar's, but St. Hilary commented on that, that
the less we had of Caesar, the less we would have to
render to him. -- Dorothy Day

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20110722/6782f0da/attachment.html>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list