[mpeg-OTspec] RE: New work on 3rd edition of the OFF (AHG kick-off)

[Leonardo Chiariglione]

The right question is instead: how much the standard development process would be affected if MPEG did not select a format.

 

Concerning your more generally accessible, as the standard should be I assume that word is generally accessible

Leonardo 

 

From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dave.pawson at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 07 August, 2012 10:41
To: leonardo at chiariglione.org
Cc: OTspec
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: New work on 3rd edition of the OFF (AHG kick-off)

 

 

On 7 August 2012 09:24, Leonardo Chiariglione <leonardo at chiariglione.org> wrote:

I do not know whether openness – whatever its definition – is a requirement for successful standardisation.

MPEG has been working for more than 20 years based on word as the format to enable repurposing of members’ contributions,

 

 

 

 I wonder how many 'members' you exclude by using Word?

  By open I mean more generally accessible, as the standard should be.

 

regards  




 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20120807/3740dbda/attachment.html>