[mpeg-OTspec] RE: New work on 3rd edition of the OFF (AHG kick-off)

[Leonardo Chiariglione]

If not you, then Dave should list the benefits that would be achieved by changing the format

Leonardo 

 

From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of suzuki toshiya
Sent: Tuesday, 07 August, 2012 16:36
To: leonardo at chiariglione.org
Cc: 'Dave Pawson'; 'OTspec'
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: New work on 3rd edition of the OFF (AHG kick-off)

 

  

Oh, sorry. Yet I'm not proposing to change the format for the document
interchange in SC29/WG11. Just I was asking what format Dave wants to
propose as an alternative.

Regards,
suzuki toshiya, Hiroshima University, Japan

Leonardo Chiariglione wrote:
> Dear Suzuki-san,
> 
> If you want to change the format you should list the benefits that would be achieved by the change
> 
> Leonardo 
> 
> 
> 
> From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com <mailto:mpeg-OTspec%40yahoogroups.com>  [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com <mailto:mpeg-OTspec%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of suzuki toshiya
> Sent: Tuesday, 07 August, 2012 16:16
> To: 'Dave Pawson'
> Cc: 'OTspec'
> Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: New work on 3rd edition of the OFF (AHG kick-off)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Although SC29/WG11 has long history using Microsoft Word as
> the default format of the document interchange, some members
> in font AHG might not share the history (and might think
> different format is better).
> 
> Dave, do you have any alternative idea on the document format
> for font AHG? If you have, do you think it is better format
> for other SC29/WG11 members?
> 
> Regards,
> suzuki toshiya, Hiroshima University, Japan
> 
> Leonardo Chiariglione wrote:
>> The right question is instead: how much the standard development process would be affected if MPEG did not select a format.
>>
>>
>>
>> Concerning your more generally accessible, as the standard should be I assume that word is generally accessible
>>
>> Leonardo 
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dave.pawson at gmail.com <mailto:dave.pawson%40gmail.com>  <mailto:dave.pawson%40gmail.com> ] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, 07 August, 2012 10:41
>> To: leonardo at chiariglione.org <mailto:leonardo%40chiariglione.org>  <mailto:leonardo%40chiariglione.org> 
>> Cc: OTspec
>> Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: New work on 3rd edition of the OFF (AHG kick-off)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 August 2012 09:24, Leonardo Chiariglione <leonardo at chiariglione.org <mailto:leonardo%40chiariglione.org>  <mailto:leonardo%40chiariglione.org> > wrote:
>>
>> I do not know whether openness – whatever its definition – is a requirement for successful standardisation.
>>
>> MPEG has been working for more than 20 years based on word as the format to enable repurposing of members’ contributions,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder how many 'members' you exclude by using Word?
>>
>> By open I mean more generally accessible, as the standard should be.
>>
>>
>>
>> regards 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20120807/bc313fd5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 126 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20120807/bc313fd5/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 126 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20120807/bc313fd5/attachment-0001.bin>