Schema for Composite Font Representation format (was RE: [mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off)

[Ken Lunde]

Dave,

Someone can correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that the text is implicitly normative, and that the DTD is explicitly normative ("normative" in parentheses follows Annex A).

-- Ken
 
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:

> On 28 February 2012 18:44, Ken Lunde <lunde at adobe.com> wrote:
>> Dave,
>> 
>> I just went through your RelaxNG schema with the proverbial fine-tooth comb, and doing so uncovered another minor error in the DTD, which I already conveyed to Vladimir. The Matrix element has six attributes, but your schema had only five. The second instance of the "tx" attribute should instead be "ty" (note that it is correct in the text of the standard, meaning in Section 5.11). I found no other problems or irregularities with either the DTD nor your schema.
>> 
>> Regards...
>> 
>> -- Ken
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks Ken.
>  Which is normative btw? DTD/ Text.... or
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> -- 
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk