Schema for Composite Font Representation format (was RE: [mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off)

[Ken Lunde]

Vladimir,

Does this mean that the ISO Secretariat has accepted the minor editorial changes to the DTD in Annex A so that the first published version will reflect the changes? If so, it is great news.

Regards...

-- Ken

On Mar 2, 2012, at 7:59 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:

> FYI - I sent an updated text to ISO Secretariat.
> 
> Regards,
> Vlad
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com]
> > On Behalf Of Levantovsky, Vladimir
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:34 PM
> > To: James Cloos; mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
> > Cc: Ken Lunde; Dave Pawson
> > Subject: RE: Schema for Composite Font Representation format (was RE:
> > [mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off)
> > 
> > I am waiting for the response from the ISO Secretariat to see if the
> > document can still be edited and if we can correct this.
> > 
> > Stay tuned,
> > Vlad
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-
> > OTspec at yahoogroups.com]
> > > On Behalf Of James Cloos
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 11:28 AM
> > > To: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
> > > Cc: Ken Lunde; Dave Pawson; Levantovsky, Vladimir
> > > Subject: Re: Schema for Composite Font Representation format (was RE:
> > > [mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off)
> > >
> > > >>>>> "KL" == Ken Lunde <lunde at adobe.com> writes:
> > >
> > > KL> Vladimir: What are the chances of applying this minor edit to
> > > KL> the embedded DTD, specifically to remove all comments?
> > >
> > > Why remove the comments? Removing the string "--" from the comments
> > > should be enough.
> > >
> > > -JimC
> > > --
> > > James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
>