[mpeg-OTspec] post table: Macintosh "standard" glyph names?

Bob Hallissy bobh528 at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 13 22:38:13 CEST 2013


Yes, changing the external reference in the bibliography section would 
provide a better informative list than we have now, and that would be 
better than nothing.

But to my mind it would be even better to have a normative list as this 
provides motivation for tool developers to update their products to 
conform to the standard list, and this is a win for font developers.

Bob

On 2013-09-13 at 10:33 Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> It seems that resolving the issue you found with glyph names would be 
> as easy as changing the external informative reference in the 
> “Bibliography” section – would you still prefer to have the glyph 
> names explicitly listed in the annex to the spec?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20130913/44ff2f7e/attachment.html>


More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list