[mpeg-OTspec] post table: Macintosh "standard" glyph names?
Bob Hallissy
bobh528 at yahoo.com
Fri Sep 13 22:38:13 CEST 2013
Yes, changing the external reference in the bibliography section would
provide a better informative list than we have now, and that would be
better than nothing.
But to my mind it would be even better to have a normative list as this
provides motivation for tool developers to update their products to
conform to the standard list, and this is a win for font developers.
Bob
On 2013-09-13 at 10:33 Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> It seems that resolving the issue you found with glyph names would be
> as easy as changing the external informative reference in the
> “Bibliography” section – would you still prefer to have the glyph
> names explicitly listed in the annex to the spec?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20130913/44ff2f7e/attachment.html>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list