Re: [mpeg-OTspec] Re: DSIG
Simon Daniels MSFT
iloveverdana at hotmail.com
Sat May 17 07:07:31 CEST 2014
I don't think we have a view on this. We're just asking that proposed changes don't add to the confusion, or cause support calls and alarm. Redefining what OpenType means shouldn't be taken lightly.
Cheers, Si
Sent from Windows Mail
From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 9:25 PM
To: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
On 2014-05-16 at 21:30 Simon Daniels wrote:
> what users can expect an OpenType font to provide moving forward.
So what, in Microsoft's view, should users expect an Opentype font to
provide that they should not expect from a TrueType font (other than an
"O" icon)?
just trying to understand...
Bob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20140517/f9726af1/attachment.html>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list