[mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off and new draft to review
Chris Lilley
chris at w3.org
Fri Nov 28 14:17:02 CET 2014
Hello Sairus,
Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 10:00:48 PM, you wrote:
> Here is the proposed wording:
I'm supportive of that proposed wording. It achieves the clarification
for which I was striving but which my earlier draft failed to attain.
> “The SVG glyph descriptions are able to express their own explicit
> or “hard-coded” colors as well. These are not related to color
> variables and thus do not vary by palette selection. See the SVG
> table’s specification for more details.”
>
> Note that the SVG glyph descriptions are able to express their own
> explicit or “hard-coded” colors as well. These are not related to
> color variables and thus do not vary by palette selection. For
> example, a font designer may want the teardrop on a crying emoji
> always to be blue (this is “hard-coded”) but the rest of the emoji
> regulated by color variables, with the skin of the face having a
> default value of the classic “smiley face” yellow (default both in
> the SVG glyph description itself – see the var(--color0, yellow)
> example below – and in the default color palette).
--
Best regards,
Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list