New file uploaded to mpeg-OTspec

[mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com]

Hello,


This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the mpeg-OTspec
group.


  File        : /2016-09-01 SVG OT Proposals_Adobe.docx
  Uploaded by : sairuspatel <sppatel at adobe.com>
  Description : Hi Vlad,
Here is the updated example (accompanying .docx file). The image, SVG code, & accompanying description have all been tweaked, so please simply replace the example in its entirely.
Thanks!
Sairus




From: "mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com" <mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com> on behalf of "'Levantovsky, Vladimir' vladimir.levantovsky at monotype.com [mpeg-OTspec]" <mpeg-OTspec-noreply at yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky at monotype.com>
Date: Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM
To: Sairus Patel <sppatel at adobe.com>, "mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com" <mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [mpeg-OTspec] Ballot comments for the second OFF (3rd ed.) amendment


Correction – turned out we still have time until Sep. 15 to submit new comments!


 


Cheers,


Vladimir


 


 


From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 'Levantovsky, Vladimir' vladimir.levantovsky at monotype.com [mpeg-OTspec]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 2:59 PM
To: Sairus Patel; mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [mpeg-OTspec] Ballot comments for the second OFF (3rd ed.) amendment


 










Thank you Sairus, I will definitely correct this!


Referring to your previous email and my reply to it – do you think you will be able to provide an updated example for “Specifying text color in glyphs” to address the concerns raised in point 2 of your previous email? If yes, I need the updates ASAP – technically we are already late with submitting these comments.


 


Thank you,


Vlad


 




From: Sairus Patel [mailto:sppatel at adobe.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 6:19 PM
To: Levantovsky, Vladimir; mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] Ballot comments for the second OFF (3rd ed.) amendment 


Hi Vlad,


I noticed a mis-“translation” between Adobe’s proposal at "2016-05-20 SVG OT Proposals_Adobe.docx” and the ballot comment’s diff language. The Adobe proposal item 3.1 indicates the actual text to be replaced: it’s the 4th & 5th paragraphs of the “Glyph Rendering” subclass, not just the 5th paragraph that the ballot comment mentions. Could you please fix the ballot comment to say “4th and 5th paragraph”?


 


Thanks,


 


Sairus


You can access this file at the URL:
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mpeg-OTspec/files/2016-09-01%20SVG%20OT%20Proposals_Adobe.docx


To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_GRPS&locale=en_US&id=SLN15398


Regards,


sairuspatel <sppatel at adobe.com>