New file uploaded to mpeg-OTspec

mpeg-OTspec at mpeg-OTspec at
Fri Sep 2 03:22:09 CEST 2016


This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the mpeg-OTspec

  File        : /2016-09-01 SVG OT Proposals_Adobe.docx
  Uploaded by : sairuspatel <sppatel at>
  Description : Hi Vlad,
Here is the updated example (accompanying .docx file). The image, SVG code, & accompanying description have all been tweaked, so please simply replace the example in its entirely.

From: "mpeg-OTspec at" <mpeg-OTspec at> on behalf of "'Levantovsky, Vladimir' vladimir.levantovsky at [mpeg-OTspec]" <mpeg-OTspec-noreply at>
Reply-To: Vladimir Levantovsky <vladimir.levantovsky at>
Date: Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM
To: Sairus Patel <sppatel at>, "mpeg-OTspec at" <mpeg-OTspec at>
Subject: RE: [mpeg-OTspec] Ballot comments for the second OFF (3rd ed.) amendment

Correction – turned out we still have time until Sep. 15 to submit new comments!






From: mpeg-OTspec at [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at] On Behalf Of 'Levantovsky, Vladimir' vladimir.levantovsky at [mpeg-OTspec]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 2:59 PM
To: Sairus Patel; mpeg-OTspec at
Subject: RE: [mpeg-OTspec] Ballot comments for the second OFF (3rd ed.) amendment


Thank you Sairus, I will definitely correct this!

Referring to your previous email and my reply to it – do you think you will be able to provide an updated example for “Specifying text color in glyphs” to address the concerns raised in point 2 of your previous email? If yes, I need the updates ASAP – technically we are already late with submitting these comments.


Thank you,



From: Sairus Patel [mailto:sppatel at] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 6:19 PM
To: Levantovsky, Vladimir; mpeg-OTspec at
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] Ballot comments for the second OFF (3rd ed.) amendment 

Hi Vlad,

I noticed a mis-“translation” between Adobe’s proposal at "2016-05-20 SVG OT Proposals_Adobe.docx” and the ballot comment’s diff language. The Adobe proposal item 3.1 indicates the actual text to be replaced: it’s the 4th & 5th paragraphs of the “Glyph Rendering” subclass, not just the 5th paragraph that the ballot comment mentions. Could you please fix the ballot comment to say “4th and 5th paragraph”?





You can access this file at the URL:

To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:


sairuspatel <sppatel at>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list