[MPEG-OTSPEC] DSIG spec issue

[Dave Crossland]

It is a problem of th 2 main audiences, one of which is font makers who
need to know all such arcane implementation specific minutia, and the other
being implementors, who may not care very much about info not related to
interop.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:49 PM Peter Constable <pgcon6 at msn.com> wrote:

> Not sure if that was at all serious. In general, I think the spec should
> have less product-specific details—minimal as possible. Such details would
> be better in a companion commentary. (Wiki?)
>
>
>
> *From:* Dave Crossland <dcrossland at google.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2020 7:42 PM
> *To:* Peter Constable <pgcon6 at msn.com>
> *Cc:* mpeg-otspec <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
> *Subject:* Re: [MPEG-OTSPEC] DSIG spec issue
>
>
>
> Good to know; perhaps worth documenting in the specs when the DSIG table
> text is updated, for anyone still making fonts for Vista-- :)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200826/77c8f8a3/attachment-0001.html>