[MPEG-OTSPEC] Consensus Protocol

[MURATA Makoto]

Aren't we going to use the W3C process and rely
on the W3C convention on the use of GitHub?

Regards,
Makoto

2020年8月26日(水) 13:42 Dave Crossland <dcrossland at google.com>:

>
> In thread RE: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Updates to specification, On Wed, Aug 19, 2020
> at 2:22 PM Peter Constable <pgcon6 at msn.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I have pointed out in the past and again this morning in another thread
>> that a weakness in the current AHG process is that it’s possible for things
>> to go into OFF without really having had a lot of review from implementers.
>> Not that there hasn’t been reasonable opportunity for review, but more that
>> the engagement is passive: a proposal can be made and incorporated unless
>> objections are raised, with silence treated as implicit consent. But I
>> don’t think it can really be considered consent if a proposal wasn’t
>> actually reviewed: silence gives no indication up, down or sideways. I’d
>> prefer to see more thumbs up on anything before adoption.
>>
>
> Hmm... Whose thumbs ought to go up, and if someone gives a thumbs down,
> what then?
>
> Vlad, I'd like to request from you that, as chair, you write down and
> share the full AHG consensus protocol you want the group to use, as a
> proposal, and see if the group can agree to it, according to itself :)
> _______________________________________________
> mpeg-otspec mailing list
> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
>


-- 
Regards,
Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200826/216d7e4e/attachment.html>