[MPEG-OTSPEC] [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Consensus RE: proposal: COLR extension

[Renzhi Li]

The updated (Oct 1) version looked fine for me. Retract my objection.

Yours,
Renzhi
________________________________
From: Dave Crossland <dcrossland at google.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 18:27
To: Renzhi Li <Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com>
Cc: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com>; MPEG OT Spec list (mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at) <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Call for Consensus RE: proposal: COLR extension



On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, 8:11 PM Peter Constable <pgcon6 at msn.com<mailto:pgcon6 at msn.com>> wrote:

Thanks, Renzhi. I’ve updated the doc, and that has been corrected.



From: Renzhi Li <Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com<mailto:Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com>>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 3:54 PM
To: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com<mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com>>; Peter Constable <pgcon6 at msn.com<mailto:pgcon6 at msn.com>>; MPEG OT Spec list (mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at<mailto:mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>) <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at<mailto:mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>>
Subject: Re: Call for Consensus RE: proposal: COLR extension

I have an objection on a detail around the table describing data type LayerV1List, between line 99 and 100

Now that Peter has updated it to address this, do you retract your objection?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201002/ba7e3a2a/attachment-0001.html>