[MPEG-OTSPEC] [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Consensus RE: proposal: COLR extension

Renzhi Li Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com
Fri Oct 2 04:02:19 CEST 2020

After some more reading I have new objection around a wording around line 217:
This graph is expected to be acyclic—that is, a tree.
An acyclic directed graph (DAG) may not be a tree. When we are talking about the Paint's, it is possible that two offsets from different Paint's points to the same paint.


Please clarify that whether sharing Paints via directing offsets to same target is allowed.

Yours Sincerely,
From: Dave Crossland <dcrossland at google.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 18:38
To: Renzhi Li <Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com>
Cc: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com>; MPEG OT Spec list (mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at) <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Call for Consensus RE: proposal: COLR extension

On Thu, Oct 1, 2020, 9:29 PM Renzhi Li <Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com<mailto:Renzhi.Li at microsoft.com>> wrote:
The updated (Oct 1) version looked fine for me. Retract my objection.

Thank you!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201002/5e37e328/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 38297 bytes
Desc: image.png
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201002/5e37e328/attachment-0001.png>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list