[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

[Dave Crossland]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:53 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

>
> > Also thank you for mention about 32-bit GID. Yes, it is clearly font
> file format discussion. I'm still wondering whether it should be
> standardized as an extension of ISO/IEC 14496-22, or, different font file
> format (of MPEG-4? or something else? yet I'm unfamiliar how many font file
> formats were proposed and dropped in the past, under SC29/WG11). I'm glad
> to hear that SC29/WG3 Font AHG would keep the door opened to hear the
> proposal for such big change.
>
> When it comes to the work of extending 64K glyph limits, the amount of
> changes will be substantial,
>

Well, I think it is desirable that fonts that do not contain more than 64k
glyphs should not be affected in any way by the effort to allow fonts to
contain more than 64k glyphs.

>From this perspective, it will not be a big change.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201007/17ed6f31/attachment-0001.html>