[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

Levantovsky, Vladimir Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com
Thu Oct 8 02:06:12 CEST 2020

+ Suzuki, Teruhiko (Sony)

Dear Murata-san,

Thank you for your input.
First, I used documents numbers as they appear in the SC29/WG3 document registry - this is the established practice of this WG.

Second, you are once again bringing up the procedural issue for discussion of this AHG, the issue that lies outside of any of the AHG mandates, and that this AHG is not entitled to discuss. (FYI - Google is a member of US NB and SC29.)


From: mpeg-otspec <mpeg-otspec-bounces at lists.aau.at> On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 7:30 PM
To: mpeg-otspec <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
Subject: Re: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

Comments on "Input Contributions for this meeting"

First, please use document numbers in the SC29 or SC29/WG3

Second, most of the authors of "Proposed amendments for
extending COLR table format and functionality (Google)" are
not members of SC29/WG3. How can the document be

Makoto (not wearing the hat of SC34)
mpeg-otspec mailing list
mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at<mailto:mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201008/3187f857/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list