[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

Behdad Esfahbod behdad at behdad.org
Thu Oct 8 20:28:45 CEST 2020


On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 12:09 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, October 8, 2020 12:17 PM Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:31 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:
>
> Fair enough. The allegations of potential wrongdoing have been made, a
> request for submitting specific complaints and facts that support multiple
> allegations to a higher authority has, so far, remained unanswered.
>
>
>
> What are you talking about? More fabricated "facts".
>
>
>
> I first asked you on July 5th to tell me how to file a complaint. You
> refused it. Wasn't until September that you gave me Young's name. And I
> submitted my complaint to him. He has not asked me for further
> documentation. You are just fabricating "facts" to confuse everybody.
>
>
>
> Did you see this email?
> https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2020-September/002468.html
>

No I had not.


> Have you responded to it?
>

As I have been repeatedly telling you, my accusations directly involve you
(they didn't; until you started trying to silence me). So stop acting as
the judge. You have conflicting interests. Just stop it.


> What’s your next “accusation du jour”?
>
>
>
>
> No official conclusions have been reached - therefore, I am not going to
> comment on any of this as parts of ongoing investigation in the AHG report.
> These matters are now in the SC29/WG3 hands, not in this AHG.
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201008/6d0a6200/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list