[MPEG-OTSPEC] Agendas and minutes of the Font AHG

Levantovsky, Vladimir Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com
Wed Sep 30 21:24:42 CEST 2020


AHG on Font Format conducts its business online via email list and shared documents (either proposals shared by their authors or WG public output documents shared with AHG members for review. The AHG reports are provided for each WG meeting and summarize AHG activities.

The AHG typically does not conduct any work via meetings (unless this is specifically indicated as part of the mandate), so the fact that you couldn’t find any “minutes” or “resolutions” isn’t a surprise – by the very nature of our work we submit recommendations to the WG (as part of the AHG report), but we do not make resolutions (like WGs do).

Hope this helps,
Vladimir


From: mpeg-otspec <mpeg-otspec-bounces at lists.aau.at> On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 11:59 PM
To: mpeg-otspec <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
Subject: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Agendas and minutes of the Font AHG

Folks,

I am investigating the email archive available
at https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/I0l-CDk2rQtBjx7gfW7Vbd/>.

I searched for "agenda", "minutes", and "report".
They appear in the email archive several times.  A
few of them are available as attachments.
But the others are no longer available at the
Yahoo ML archive.

There are some AHG reports (as part of emails),
but they do not look like minutes or resolutions
of the AHG.   As the convenor of SC34/WG4,
I write reports but they are not considered as
authoritative documents.

The document archive of WG11 at https://isotc.iso.org<https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/DrorCER2v0uW1qwRswIBOY>
is also gone.

I will contact the SC29 secretariat and try to find
more.

Regards,
Makoto

2020年9月27日(日) 17:44 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp<mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>>:
Folks,

The document repository of SC29 has records of ballots
in the past.  I downloaded the summaries of 16 ballots
related to OFF and had a quick look at them.

All countries except US have always said
YES without comments.  There are a few
exceptions, but they are one-paragraph
editorial comments attached to Yes.
It is only US that has made non-trivial comments.

Although there appear to be different opinions around
color fonts, I find no discussion documents in the SC29
document repository about them.  I might be
missing something since the document archive of
WG11 is not available now.  I will contact the SC29
committee officer about this.

--
Regards,
Makoto


--
Regards,
Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200930/18758b6d/attachment.html>


More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list