From eb2mmrt at gmail.com Mon Sep 15 21:42:55 2025 From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com (MURATA) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 04:42:55 +0900 Subject: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Status of DIS Ballot Comments Discussion for Open Font Format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you for your detailed reply. I just attended an SC34 plenary in Seattle. In connection with the ongoing revision of OOXML, SC34 and ISO discussed more than a year ago how closely the final publication should follow the Directives, Part 2. Although producing a fully compliant text was not feasible, we reached agreement on the necessary adjustments, and SC34 revised the text accordingly. However, as publication approaches, ISO has requested a Word version and now appears ready to introduce additional changes beyond what was agreed. You wrote "the FDIS text is expected to be registered for final approval on Sep. 7" but this has not happened yet. Are there any discussions between ISO and SC29? Regards, Makoto 2025?8?28?(?) 9:25 Vladimir Levantovsky : > Apologies for a delayed response - I was traveling last week. > The WG break-out meeting report summarizing font related discussions is > available at > https://dms.mpeg.expert/doc_end_user/documents/151_Daejeon/wg11/m73810-v1-m73810.zip > . > The "Disposition of Comments" document is available for review at > https://dms.mpeg.expert/doc_end_user/documents/151_Daejeon/wg11/MDS25324_WG03_N01577.zip and > can also be viewed at > https://sd.iso.org/documents/open/ab834af5-952d-4c07-91ce-c8522ffd503b > The text of the FDIS is available for download at > https://dms.mpeg.expert/doc_end_user/documents/151_Daejeon/wg11/MDS25325_WG03_N01578.zip > and can also be accessed at > https://sd.iso.org/documents/open/8d807e86-2dca-42dc-bf5f-804299cb20b4 > According to ISO project status details tracker ( > https://sd.iso.org/projects/project/87621/overview), the full report on > DIS text approved for registration as FDIS was circulated on Aug. 7, while > the FDIS text is expected to be registered for final approval on Sep. 7. > > Thank you, > Vladimir > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:44?PM MURATA via mpeg-otspec < > mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at> wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> I would appreciate it if you could let me know what the outcome of the >> Font Format Break-out Group meeting was, and the current status of the >> ballot comment resolution process. >> >> Thank you very much for your kind assistance. >> >> Best regards, >> Makoto Murata >> _______________________________________________ >> mpeg-otspec mailing list >> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at >> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec >> > -- -- ??????????? ?? ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com Mon Sep 15 22:52:54 2025 From: vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com (Vladimir Levantovsky) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:52:54 -0400 Subject: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Status of DIS Ballot Comments Discussion for Open Font Format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > You wrote "the FDIS text is expected to be registered for final approval on Sep. 7" but this has not happened yet. Are there any discussions between ISO and SC29? I am not aware (and haven't been a party) of any additional discussions held since the last SC29/WG03 meeting in July, where the DIS comments were discussed and the text updated accordingly. The final edited version of the DIS was sent to ISO EPM and SC29 Secretariat on July 28. According to the ISO project portal, the DIS text was approved for registration as FDIS on Aug. 7, and I am puzzled as to why the FDIS approval ballot hasn't been issued yet - it was supposed to happen on or before Sep. 7. Regards, Vladimir On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 3:43?PM MURATA wrote: > Thank you for your detailed reply. I just attended an SC34 plenary in > Seattle. In connection with the ongoing revision of OOXML, SC34 and ISO > discussed more than a year ago how closely the final publication should > follow the Directives, Part 2. Although producing a fully compliant text > was not feasible, we reached agreement on the necessary adjustments, and > SC34 revised the text accordingly. However, as publication approaches, ISO > has requested a Word version and now appears ready to introduce additional > changes beyond what was agreed. > > You wrote "the FDIS text is expected to be registered for final > approval on Sep. 7" but this has not happened yet. Are there any > discussions between ISO and SC29? > > Regards, > Makoto > > 2025?8?28?(?) 9:25 Vladimir Levantovsky : > >> Apologies for a delayed response - I was traveling last week. >> The WG break-out meeting report summarizing font related discussions is >> available at >> https://dms.mpeg.expert/doc_end_user/documents/151_Daejeon/wg11/m73810-v1-m73810.zip >> . >> The "Disposition of Comments" document is available for review at >> https://dms.mpeg.expert/doc_end_user/documents/151_Daejeon/wg11/MDS25324_WG03_N01577.zip and >> can also be viewed at >> https://sd.iso.org/documents/open/ab834af5-952d-4c07-91ce-c8522ffd503b >> The text of the FDIS is available for download at >> https://dms.mpeg.expert/doc_end_user/documents/151_Daejeon/wg11/MDS25325_WG03_N01578.zip >> and can also be accessed at >> https://sd.iso.org/documents/open/8d807e86-2dca-42dc-bf5f-804299cb20b4 >> According to ISO project status details tracker ( >> https://sd.iso.org/projects/project/87621/overview), the full report on >> DIS text approved for registration as FDIS was circulated on Aug. 7, while >> the FDIS text is expected to be registered for final approval on Sep. 7. >> >> Thank you, >> Vladimir >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:44?PM MURATA via mpeg-otspec < >> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at> wrote: >> >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> I would appreciate it if you could let me know what the outcome of the >>> Font Format Break-out Group meeting was, and the current status of the >>> ballot comment resolution process. >>> >>> Thank you very much for your kind assistance. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Makoto Murata >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpeg-otspec mailing list >>> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at >>> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec >>> >> > > -- > -- > ??????????? > ?? ? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: