<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>RE: FW: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: Proposed changes to the
OFF spec</title></head><body>
<div>That set will unfortunately include some of Adobe's. We're in the
process of figuring out which of ours fall into this category. (I
suspect it's only a few, but that's TBD.)</div>
<div>- thanks,</div>
<div> David L</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>At 1:53 PM -0700 7/22/11, Michelle Perham wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>According to Greg, yes, there is a risk
of these problems. What we don't know is how many of these fonts
exist.</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Michelle</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite> </blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><b>From:</b> mpeg-OTspec@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:mpeg-OTspec@yahoogroups.com]<b> On Behalf Of</b> John
Hudson<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, July 22, 2011 10:36 AM<br>
<b>Cc:</b> mpeg-OTspec@yahoogroups.com</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><b>Subject:</b> Re: FW: [mpeg-OTspec] RE:
Proposed changes to the OFF specification</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>I am aware of some fonts using what Greg
labels Panose 1.5 values in the<br>
OS/2 table. Am I correct in thinking that there is a risk of these
being<br>
misinterpreted or, in case of values out of range of Panose 1.0,
ignored<br>
or causing problems?</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite><br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>JH</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div>David Lemon<br>
Sr Manager, Type Development<br>
Adobe Systems, Inc.<br>
<br>
408 536 4152<br>
lemon@adobe.com<br>
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography</div>
</body>
</html>