<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-01-03 at 16:13 Michelle Perham
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid #009900 !important;
border-right: 2px solid #009900 !important; padding: 0px 15px 0px
15px; margin: 8px 2px;"
cite="mid:C48F84B3297C6146BC5303DF01F7E2BB0F7F93FC@TK5EX14MBXC261.redmond.corp.microsoft.com"
type="cite">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">>>
Is it an intentional change from using U+0027 APOSTROPHE in
names to using U+2019 RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK (e.g., N'Ko
-> N’ko) ? Or was that an inadvertent result of Word's
auto-correct?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p>Not
an intentional change. I agree we should be consistent here.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ok, so what is the purpose of the N'Ko -> N’ko change -- just to
lowercase the 'k'? But the ISO name for this language is N'Ko
(uppercase K).<br>
<br>
Also, I was curious about the proposed Swahili -> Kiswahili
change -- do most people look under "K" to find the name of this
language? <br>
<br>
(I don't have any dog in the fight -- just trying to understand)<br>
<br>
Bob<br>
</body>
</html>