<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0,
0);" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2016-02-16 at 09:36 'Levantovsky,
Vladimir' wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid #009900 !important;
border-right: 2px solid #009900 !important; padding: 0px 15px 0px
15px; margin: 8px 2px;"
cite="mid:975645a694d040aa92019104a58da261@wob-maildb-04.agfamonotype.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Please review and respond with your comments.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
In the "Application interface" paragraph for the revised
init/fina/medi/isol descriptions, the wording is revised from what
John originally wrote, and I'm not sure the revision is correct. For
example, the "Application interface" paragraph for "fina" ends by
saying:<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">For
GIDs with
single-joining final forms found in the ‘fina’ coverage table,
the application
passes a GID to the feature and gets back a new GID.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
The problem with this wording is that single-joining final forms
won't be <i>found in the 'fina' </i><i>coverage </i>table.
Rather, for those isolates that have final forms it is the <i>isolate
form glyphs</i> that will be in the coverage table and it is the
purpose of the 'fina' feature to replace the isolate with the final
form.<br>
<br>
Similarly for the other lookups (though perhaps one could get away
with this wording for the 'isol' feature).<br>
<br>
Bob<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>