<div dir="ltr">This is what I'm talking about:<div><a href="https://github.com/googlefonts/colr-gradients-spec/issues/31#issuecomment-675686317">https://github.com/googlefonts/colr-gradients-spec/issues/31#issuecomment-675686317</a></div><div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">behdad<br><a href="http://behdad.org/" target="_blank">http://behdad.org/</a></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:50 AM Behdad Esfahbod <<a href="mailto:behdad@behdad.org">behdad@behdad.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <<a href="mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com" target="_blank">Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Hi Behdad,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I am sorry you feel that your voice has not been heard, I happen to think this is not the case and that your voice is heard loud and clear.</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Vlad,</div><div><br></div><div>I asked you to tell me how I can make a formal complaint to ISO. You asked that we videocall. During the video call your only goal was to talk me out of wanting to file a formal complaint. Your argument was that it will disturb the adhoc situ. In reality I see now, you are only concerned with maintaining your own position. At any rate, I agreed to let you talk to Peter & MS to see if they are willing to accept fault, apologize, and commit to a fair process. You said you'll go talk to them, and you made sure to repeat three times that it will take time. Now I see you wanted to just shut me down for longer.</div><div><br></div><div>You told me that you had a long conversation with Peter after his smoking-gun message (<a href="https://gist.github.com/behdad/d08f958f8a5e2cb6badf6e32598427df" target="_blank">https://gist.github.com/behdad/d08f958f8a5e2cb6badf6e32598427df</a>). Now I see you basically agreed together to maintain your power positions each and not attack each other to keep the status quo going. Neither Peter nor MS every apologized for that illegitimate assertion of power and dominance over other parties in this space.</div><div><br></div><div>Anyway, while having this conversation with me, on this group, you go ahead and **praise** the "adhoc" process as a success story. The same adhoc that **enabled** all the abuses I'm alleging to. There's a reason standards have formal procedures, such that a minority cannot force their opinion into the standard. The "adhoc" broke that and indeed a minority hijacked the process. And you are complicit in this.</div><div><br></div><div>I lost a lot of respect for you.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm done with you and Peter and this list. What a farce.</div><div><br></div><div>I will be contacting the Canadian standardization body to exercise my rights to influence OFF. I encourage others to do the same.</div><div><br></div><div>behdad</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> You made your allegations
in various public forums and directly in this group (</span><a href="https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2020-August/001903.html" target="_blank">https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2020-August/001903.html</a><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">
and </span><a href="https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2020-August/001925.html" target="_blank">https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2020-August/001925.html</a><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">), and I am not sure
if there is anything else that has to be done to acknowledge them. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">To give this discussion a bit more of historical footing, in many of your posts you are referring to discussions that initially happened privately within a limited
group of participants, who set the ambitious goal to give the second chance in life to variable fonts technology and unify prior approaches (variation fonts from Apple and multiple masters from Adobe) as part of the new, now widely supported version of OpenType
/ OFF. Since I wasn’t a participant of those initial private discussions, I cannot comment on them, neither on their substance nor on their format. What I do know is that once the initial agreements on tentatively proposed technical solutions were reached,
the results of the discussion had been made available publicly, first for a technical review of much larger pool of participants (with many members of this group and myself included), then as a public presentation at the ATypI 2016 conference (</span><a href="https://www.atypi.org/conferences/atypi-warsaw-2016/programme/activity?a=619" target="_blank">https://www.atypi.org/conferences/atypi-warsaw-2016/programme/activity?a=619</a><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">),
and then presented to this group and to ISO WG as a collection of input contributions from their respective members (</span><a href="https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2016-October/000827.html" target="_blank">https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/2016-October/000827.html</a><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">My perspective on all this is that enabling new technical developments within the large installed base of the existing implementations on multiple different platforms
is a significant effort, one that is never easy, and it likely required taking into consideration many factors including both new technical design considerations and shortcomings of the existing legacy implementations. The fact that you were among very few
other people who could pull it off is in itself an achievement that deserves accolades and high commendations.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">We cannot change what happened in the past, but we can learn from it and adjust our behaviors to make things better in the future. If you feel that your ideas
back then had not received a sufficient level of consideration, we can always revisit them. Technical developments never stop, improvements are being made constantly, and this groups’ work is no exception. We strive to make our decisions and recommendations
by consensus if at all possible, and as part of this process we try to accommodate different concerns from a purely pragmatic point of view – working implementations deployed on multiple platforms [that may be less than perfect] would likely be seen as advantageous
to technically pure solutions that may not get wide support.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Open discussions in a public forum is what gives us needed assurances that all ideas and proposals are heard and treated equally on their value. My goal is to
protect and preserve this public forum for us to be able to continue our work. Making accusations and assigning blame for something that happened in the past, in a different setting and outside of this particular forum isn’t constructive, unless we can learn
from it, improve how we do things, and move on with the commitment to better our approaches and practices. This is clearly something we can all benefit from, in my opinion.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Thank you,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Vlad<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> Behdad Esfahbod <<a href="mailto:behdad@behdad.org" target="_blank">behdad@behdad.org</a>>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, August 17, 2020 3:58 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Levantovsky, Vladimir <<a href="mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com" target="_blank">Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> John Hudson <<a href="mailto:john@tiro.ca" target="_blank">john@tiro.ca</a>>; <a href="mailto:mpeg-otspec@lists.aau.at" target="_blank">mpeg-otspec@lists.aau.at</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Defining the text shaping working group’s scope<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 8:28 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <<a href="mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com" target="_blank">Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0in 0in 0in 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">On</span></b><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> Saturday, August 15, 2020 11:55
AM John Hudson wrote:</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt;margin-left:0.5in">
<span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><br>
</span>On 15082020 8:12 am, <span style="font-family:"MS Gothic"">梁海</span> Liang Hai wrote:<br>
> Part of the reason why I’m not keen on organizing this collective effort under ISO’s management (be it a WG, Ad Hoc Group, or what), is that ISO and/or JTC1’s publication process is not suitable for the documents we’re thinking. All we need is an easy to
navigate modern website with all the vital information we want to maintain, but I doubt ISO/IEC ITTF will grant us that. To be honest, it’s a pain to read those procedural documents in JTC1’s official format—it’s just gonna discourage potential participants
for no good reason.<br>
<br>
Agreed.<br>
<br>
Vlad does a great job of managing the institutional requirements — not <br>
only for OFF and ISO but also for webfonts and W3C — but I'm not keen on <br>
a process that effectively makes one person the interface between <br>
collective effort and institutional approval.<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">Thank you John for your acknowledgement of my efforts. I would like to clarify certain things because
I feel there is a possibility for confusion here as you mentioned two related but vastly different activities [that ironically share similar names – OFF and WOFF], where the roles I play are very different.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">...</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">From ISO WG point of view, this started as an experiment and a favor to the community, and, after many
years of successful development, we are now seen as pioneers of sorts, <a href="https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/d7T0CZ6oyzh5vrVnuzi9YX" target="_blank">
a group that did things differently and proved that we can be very successful and achieve great results with the bulk of the work done offline</a>. We also earned trust that our proposals and recommendations are consistently of high quality, and the successful
industry-wide adoption of ISO OFF / OpenType standard speaks volumes – one of my goals is to preserve this trust and relationships with ISO WG for the benefit of this community!</span><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/Sca0C1wnqGSMg2DwFG97Uy" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/behdadesfahbod/status/1295225739126571008</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>