<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Sep 11, 2020, 5:29 PM John Hudson <<a href="mailto:john@tiro.ca">john@tiro.ca</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>At this stage — and for a few years now
— I have interpreted any reference to ‘OpenType 2.0’ to actually
mean ‘a significantly different future font technology, whether a
flavour of OpenType or an entirely new format, actually v2.0 or
some other version number’. It provides the context for free
thinking about new concepts, a cleaner and leaner format, etc.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If this is confusing, and we'd like to
restrict use of the term to actual OT/OFF spec revision, then I
propose NextFont as a codeword for typographic futurism.</div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I propose World Type Format :)</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>