<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:39 AM Behdad Esfahbod <<a href="mailto:behdad@behdad.org">behdad@behdad.org</a>> wrote: </div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div lang="EN-US"><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-CA">GPOS/GSUB:<u></u><u></u></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-CA">It appears the proposal doesn’t yet include wide versions for common table formats that will be required (e.g., coverage). These will, of course, be needed</span></p></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I'm surprised by that. But you are right, them seem missing from the PDF document. <a class="gmail_plusreply" id="m_-3826775771532987890plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:liam@fromoldbooks.org" target="_blank">@Liam Quin</a> </div><div><br></div><div>The proposal is:</div><div><br></div><div>  <a href="https://github.com/harfbuzz/boring-expansion-spec/issues/30" target="_blank">https://github.com/harfbuzz/boring-expansion-spec/issues/30</a></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Better link: <a href="https://github.com/harfbuzz/boring-expansion-spec/blob/main/beyond-64k.md#coverage--classdef-formats-3--4">https://github.com/harfbuzz/boring-expansion-spec/blob/main/beyond-64k.md#coverage--classdef-formats-3--4</a></div></div></div>