[mpeg-OTspec] Re: A path through the thicket [1 Attachment]

[Ken Lunde]

All,

The message below was sent out on the day before Thanksgiving Day, which was three weeks ago.

Does anyone have any comments, corrections, criticisms, additions, or suggestions for the three-page document that I recirculated on that date? Does drop-dead silence translate to general agreement? I would think not, but it doesn't hurt to ask. ;-)

I am asking these questions in an effort to move this effort forward.

Keep in mind that this Composite Font format will be effective and useful only if everyone involved in its definition agrees to its principles and other format-related characteristics.

Regards...

-- Ken

On 2009/11/25, at 12:18, Ken Lunde wrote:

> [Attachment(s) from Ken Lunde included below]
> Leonardo, Vladimir & others,
> 
> Attached is a revised version of the document, with the required/ 
> optional aspects of the tags removed.
> 
> My intention of indicating "required" or "optional" stemmed from the 
> fact that the information associated with each is declared via its 
> attributes, which then suggests that at least one attribute must be 
> required, otherwise it means that a tag can be specified without any 
> data. I figured that the "Target" attribute made the most sense as 
> being required. In any case, this revised version has that information 
> removed.
> 
> I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience that this caused.
> 
> Oh, and have a safe and enjoyable Thanksgiving Day holiday!
> 
> -- Ken
> 
>