[mpeg-OTspec] Re: A path through the thicket [1 Attachment]

[Levantovsky, Vladimir]

Ken,

Thank you very much for putting together the draft. I believe we agreed to defer the discussions related to mandatory/optional nature of any tag/attribute until after we have complete functional descriptions of all XML tags we believe would be necessary / useful for Composite Fonts spec.

For convenience and easy access I put the document into the Files section of the AHG http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mpeg-OTspec/files/CompositeFont-11242009.pdf.

I would like to ask the AHG members to review the list of tags and attributes Ken prepared and to provide your input - any corrections and proposals for additional tags/attributes that you believe would be needed are very much appreciated. Once we complete this list, we will review and discuss the potential impact /cost / complexity of implementation for each element of the spec and make our final determination of the mandatory vs. optional status for each element. For now - please disregard this in the current draft and review the spec from the functional point of view.

Thank you and Happy Thanksgiving!
Vladimir


From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ken Lunde
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 2:46 PM
To: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] Re: A path through the thicket [1 Attachment]


[Attachment(s) from Ken Lunde included below]

Vladimir and others,

Please see the attached file, which I hope may represent a start at
creating a working draft of the specification.

Regards...

-- Ken

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20091125/6a97b577/attachment.html>