[mpeg-OTspec] Draft CFS requirements [1 Attachment]

[Ken Lunde]

Vladimir,

I am away from work through the end of the week, attending the 2010 SHOT Show, but I spent a few minutes going through this. It is a good summary of the requirements. The only suggestion I would make is one of terminology, specifically the following:

  CF object -> CFS object
  Composite Font (or Fonts) Format -> Composite Font Standard (or CFS)

In other words, using the decided-upon terminology, meaning "Composite Font Standard" or "CFS," would be a a good thing.

Also, in the "Use case descriptions" section, I think that the two distinct uses of CFS objects, specifically as a Composite Font or Fallback Font, should be explicitly mentioned.

Regards...

-- Ken

On 2010/01/19, at 20:39, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:

> [Attachment(s) from Levantovsky, Vladimir included below]
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I was asked to prepare a document that would summarize the draft requirements for CFS. Please see attached draft that is based on the document I submitted during the last ISO MPEG meeting. The current draft was extended to include the results of the discussion we had since the MPEG meeting in October.
> 
> Your comments are very much appreciated, please submit them no later than by the end of the day tomorrow (Wednesday, Jan. 20).
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Vladimir
> 
>  
> 
> 
>