[mpeg-OTspec] Suggestion for minor correction on figure styles

[Thomas Phinney]

On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 12:14 PM, James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com> wrote:
> Should there be any related edits to the pnum and tnum descriptions?

I don't think so. I did check the tnum and pnum descriptions, but they
had luckily not fallen into the same assumption-of-default problem as
lnum/onum. Also, there really only are the two options and no
in-between (okay, I'm ignoring the various sub-types of tabular
figures seen in ideographic languages, but those are still all
varieties of tabularity, not some completely additional states).

Regards,

T

-- 
"The rat's perturbed; it must sense nanobots! Code grey! We have a
Helvetica scenario!" — http://xkcd.com/683/