[mpeg-OTspec] Draft AHG report

suzuki toshiya mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Tue Jan 31 03:40:46 CET 2012


Dear Vladimir,

The report represents the status of Panose issue correctly, thanks.

Is it possible for you, the convenor of font AHG, to set an (expected)
schedule to close Panose issue in SC29/WG11 side? There is a defect
related with Panose in ISO/IEC 29500 and the experts in SC34/WG4 wants
to know when (and how) they can close it. This is not the comment to
the activity report, but to the agenda (if there is).

Regards,
suzuki toshiya, Hiroshima University, Japan

Ken Lunde wrote:
> Vladimir,
> 
> The report seems accurate, and thus looks fine to me.
> 
> Regards...
> 
> -- Ken
> 
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:42 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> 
>> [Attachment(s) from Levantovsky, Vladimir included below]
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>  
>>
>> The next WG11 (MPEG) meeting will take place on Feb. 6-10. Please see attached the draft AHG report summarizing the activities of the ad hoc group for the last couple of months. I would appreciate your comments and/or corrections, if I don’t hear from you by the end of the day tomorrow, I will upload the report as is.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 




More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list