[mpeg-OTspec] RE: Updates to script and language tags

[Bob Hallissy]

Actually, I did raise some issues which, as far as I can tell, have gone 
unanswered. And that was not with a detailed look at the names proposal.

Fundamentally: the proposal claims that the changes are to "more 
universally accepted" -- what authority is being used to identify such?

Lacking any information on the authority in use, I turned to iso639 and 
with just a cursory glance found some of the proposed names are not 
there -- so presumably some other authority is being referenced?

Bob



On 2013-01-11 at 16:33 Michelle Perham wrote:
>
>
> I know that a number of people reviewed the list of proposed changes, 
> but I didn’t receive any comments. If there are no objections, I’d 
> like to propose that Vlad also add this to his working draft.
>
> Michelle
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20130115/476bf75d/attachment.html>