[mpeg-OTspec] RE: Updates to script and language tags
Michelle Perham
mihill at microsoft.com
Wed Jan 16 06:22:15 CET 2013
Sorry about that, Bob. I’ll seek out answers to your questions.
Michelle
From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob Hallissy
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 5:30 PM
To: Michelle Perham
Cc: opentype-migration-list at indx.co.uk; OTspec (mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com)
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] RE: Updates to script and language tags
Actually, I did raise some issues which, as far as I can tell, have gone unanswered. And that was not with a detailed look at the names proposal.
Fundamentally: the proposal claims that the changes are to "more universally accepted" -- what authority is being used to identify such?
Lacking any information on the authority in use, I turned to iso639 and with just a cursory glance found some of the proposed names are not there -- so presumably some other authority is being referenced?
Bob
On 2013-01-11 at 16:33 Michelle Perham wrote:
I know that a number of people reviewed the list of proposed changes, but I didn’t receive any comments. If there are no objections, I’d like to propose that Vlad also add this to his working draft.
Michelle
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20130116/81e0508e/attachment.html>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list