[mpeg-OTspec] Minor typo in JSTF table

[Behdad Esfahbod]

Hi Vlad,

What you suggest sounds good to me.

behdad


On 14-03-18 01:20 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> Hi Behdad, all,
> 
> Behdad, thank you for spotting this mistake, I am adding this change to the list of recommended updates for WD6. One other thing I noticed - the descriptions of ExtensionEnableGSUB and ExtensionEnableGPOS fields are the only two entries in the table that do not explicitly specify that the offset to these tables is calculated from the beginning of the JstfPriority table - all other entries in the table say this explicitly.
> 
> Is there a reason for not saying this (I don’t think so) ? Should we modify these descriptions to say what every other description says?
> 
> Thank you,
> Vlad
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Behdad Esfahbod
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 3:00 PM
> To: opentype-migration-list at indx.co.uk; mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [mpeg-OTspec] Minor typo in JSTF table
> 
> http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/jstf.htm
> 
> In the JstfPriority table, the comments for ExtensionEnableGPOS and ExtensionDisableGPOS say GSUB while they should say GPOS.
> 
> --
> behdad
> http://behdad.org/
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

-- 
behdad
http://behdad.org/