[mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off and new draft to review

Levantovsky, Vladimir vladimir.levantovsky at monotype.com
Wed Feb 4 23:31:55 CET 2015

Dear AHG members,

Thank you very much for your active participation in the preparation of the ballot comments. At this point, all ballot comments have been submitted to the ISO Secretariat and the final summary of voting is now available. We received ballot comments from three National Bodies (France, Japan and US) - many of them have been preliminary discussed on this email list.

Since we are getting close to the next WG11 (MPEG) meeting where the 3rd edition OFF document will [hopefully] be approved and promoted to the International Standard - I would like to use the time we have to make sure that all comments have been properly addressed in the text of the standard. I prepared the preliminary final draft (attached) where all the suggested changes and clarifications have been incorporated in the text. I would appreciate it very much if you would find the time to review the text of the future standard and reply to this list with your comments if you find any discrepancies or anything that needs correction.

Thank you very much for your help!

-----Original Message-----
From: mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com [mailto:mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 'Levantovsky, Vladimir' vladimir.levantovsky at monotype.com [mpeg-OTspec]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 2:40 PM
To: Chris Lilley; Sairus Patel
Cc: Cameron McCormack; mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off and new draft to review

Dear Chris, Sairus, all,

Thank you very much for providing and finalizing the additional comments. At this point, I believe we have addressed all the issues that were raised to date and the exact language of all comments is now finalized. Please see attached the latest draft version of all ballot comments we discussed, the highlighted portions show the differences between this and the Oct. 16 version (first draft) of the document. Please review all the comments and let me know if you find anything that needs to be changed.

Thank you,

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris at w3.org]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 8:17 AM
To: Sairus Patel
Cc: Sairus Patel sppatel at adobe.com [mpeg-OTspec]; Cameron McCormack; mpeg-OTspec at yahoogroups.com; Levantovsky, Vladimir
Subject: Re: [mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off and new draft to review

Hello Sairus,

Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 10:00:48 PM, you wrote:

>  Here is the proposed wording: 

I'm supportive of that proposed wording. It achieves the clarification for which I was striving but which my earlier draft failed to attain.

> "The SVG glyph descriptions are able to express their own explicit or 
> "hard-coded" colors as well. These are not related to color variables 
> and thus do not vary by palette selection. See  the SVG table's 
> specification for more details."
> Note that the SVG glyph descriptions are able to express their own 
> explicit or "hard-coded" colors as well. These are not related to 
> color variables and thus do not vary by palette selection. For 
> example, a font designer may want the teardrop on a crying  emoji 
> always to be blue (this is "hard-coded") but the rest of the emoji 
> regulated by color variables, with the skin of the face having a 
> default value of the classic "smiley face" yellow (default both in the 
> SVG glyph description itself - see the var(--color0,  yellow) example 
> below - and in the default color palette).

Best regards,
 Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain

Posted by: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com>


Yahoo Groups Links

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 374 bytes
Desc: w1xxxx_Text-14496-22_IS-redline.zip
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20150204/532596ee/attachment.bin>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list