Typo in CFF2 specification?

[Ken Lunde]

All,

Can someone double check to make sure that all instances of "65536" in the CFF2 specification are correct? See:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/opentype/spec/cff2

Given that the valid GID range for CFF is 0 through 65534 (65,535 glyphs), my understanding is that "65536" should instead be "65535," unless CFF2 was architected in a way that allows 65,536 glyphs.

Regards...

-- Ken