[MPEG-OTSPEC] Consensus Protocol

[Dave Crossland]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:12 PM Peter Constable <pgcon6 at msn.com> wrote:

> For example, if there was a proposal entailing a significant change to the
> CFF2 table and no input had been heard from Adobe, I think it would be a
> good idea to poke them to make sure they're paying attention. If they were
> and silently consenting, it's not costly to confirm that. Note that that's
> not giving anybody veto power; it's just making sure when we say there's
> broad consensus that it really is broadly representative.
>

I agree.

By using the Official MPEG OFF Github Issue Tracker as the central
discussion forum for the AHG, with tallying of reactions as I've described,
we can make sure that when we say consensus, it is broadly representative.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200827/ba233121/attachment.html>