[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

suzuki toshiya mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Wed Oct 7 11:01:16 CEST 2020

Dear Vladimir,

If I'm misunderstanding the situation, please correct me.

> The AHG conducted numerous discussions that touched on many aspects of extending our work into the new technical areas. 

> We considered a broad range of approaches and possible solutions that operate on and at the interface between text encoding and font format, including both general and specific aspects of standardization work that may not necessarily fall under the SC29/WG3 umbrella. 

Because there is a description "new technical areas", I hope more detailed comment for "not that may not necessarily fall under the SC29/WG3 umbrella". Is it technical mismatch (e.g. a part of ISO/IEC 14496 is inappropriate), or, organizational/procedual mismatch? (e.g. ISO style development is inappropriate).

The proposal to extend the font file format of ISO/IEC 14496-22, like, LABL table extension proposed by Adam, is still appropriate to be discussed under SC29/WG3 umbrella, without waiting for the formation of the technical group under W3C? I think, Font AHG is keep the motivation to maintain the font file format spec, and not leave it to W3C's technical group.


On 2020/10/07 15:07, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> Dear all,
> Please find attached the draft AHG report for your review and comments. I would like to ask you to submit your comments no later than by end of day on Wednesday, Oct. 7th. I plan to submit this report to the WG no later than the morning of Oct. 8th – sorry for a short notice.
> Thank you,
> Vlad

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list