[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

Levantovsky, Vladimir Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com
Wed Oct 7 18:58:55 CEST 2020

On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 12:47 PM Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:41 AM Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com<mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com>> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 7:09 AM Caleb Maclennan wrote:

I second Simon's objection to section IV.

Section III does a fair enough job of summarizing activities related
to the group mandates,

Thank you.

but section IV comes across as implying that
everything is now hunky-dory and back to business as usual. Given the
ongoing allegations of abuse, the unresolved proposals for disbanding
or restructuring, and the general level of frustration with the
process I don't think it's fair to summarize as "we achieved a much
better shared understanding".

I addressed this particular part of the sentence in my previous reply to Simon. As far as allegations of abuse are concerned, I think it was already established that they are without merit

How was "already established"?

By your own public admission: https://twitter.com/behdadesfahbod/status/1309574992514805761?s=20,

– it did not happen in this AHG. At this point, I am not going to argue whether something did or didn’t happen elsewhere, but as far as ISO work is concerned – there is no relevance, we do not discuss private affairs of our members.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201007/ec75ae78/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list