[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

[Behdad Esfahbod]

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:59 AM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 12:47 PM Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:41 AM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:
>
> *On* Wednesday, October 7, 2020 7:09 AM Caleb Maclennan wrote:
>
>
> I second Simon's objection to section IV.
>
> Section III does a fair enough job of summarizing activities related
> to the group mandates,
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> but section IV comes across as implying that
> everything is now hunky-dory and back to business as usual. Given the
> ongoing allegations of abuse, the unresolved proposals for disbanding
> or restructuring, and the general level of frustration with the
> process I don't think it's fair to summarize as "we achieved a much
> better shared understanding".
>
>
>
> I addressed this particular part of the sentence in my previous reply to
> Simon. As far as allegations of abuse are concerned, I think it was already
> established that they are without merit
>
>
>
> > How was "already established"?
>
>
>
> By your own public admission:
> https://twitter.com/behdadesfahbod/status/1309574992514805761?s=20,
>

By your own words anything that didn't happen on this mailing list didn't
happen as far as the AHG is concerned.

Also what I said there cannot in ANY way be interpretted the way you have
done.





> – it did not happen in this AHG. At this point, I am not going to argue
> whether something did or didn’t happen elsewhere, but as far as ISO work is
> concerned – there is no relevance, we do not discuss private affairs of our
> members.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201007/31dd01c7/attachment.html>