[MPEG-OTSPEC] near-term OT spec work

Behdad Esfahbod behdad at behdad.org
Thu Oct 8 18:08:11 CEST 2020


Just calling me "wrong" and linking to multiple lengthy documents instead
of making your point is called administrative abuse.

behdad
http://behdad.org/


On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:48 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 3:31 PM Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 10:24 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ...and the most recent work on Progressive Font Enrichment (now being
> conducted in WebFonts WG in public) was initially based on an internal work
> by Google that materialized as a proof of concept
> <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/wE_8CpYqKkUzAMVRSPttZJ>, before even the
> new WebFonts WG charter
> <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/qO6FCqxr5lFOX0EMCXCwfJ> was approved.
> In all three cases, the initial internal developments gave start to public
> work, and provided a solid foundation for WG charter approvals.
>
>
>
> That's might technically be true but inaccurate representation of the turn
> of events.
>
>
>
> You’re right prior to that , there were at least three different private
> implementations.
>
>
>
> It was in April 2018 f2f meeting of WebFonts WG at Google Berlin I think;
> the WG was looking for next projects to work on after conclusion of WOFF2.
>
>
>
> I suggested that since all of Microsoft, MonoType, Adobe, and Google have
> developed privately technology for font streaming (Google's has been Open
> Source; Tachyfont), I suggested that the WebFonts WG take on standardizing
> font streaming, which was renamed to "Progressive Font Enrichment":
>
>
>
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2018Apr/0000.html
> <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/CWx6Crkv5mtA2VkBC49k0J>
>
>
>
> So you suggesting that Google did proof of concept in private before
> bringing it to WebFonts WG is inaccurate IMO.
>
>
>
> And your recollections of the events are neither true nor accurate IMO, as
> evidenced by the meeting minutes from the two prior F2F we had in 2016 and
> 2017:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2016/09/12-webfonts-minutes.html
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RwrIS9Yzd8hrp1wlv_SiEaUI3cpRgSrtjdqV1yzV7Kg/edit?ts=5a04d39b#
>
>
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201008/7c82e936/attachment.html>


More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list