[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review

Behdad Esfahbod behdad at behdad.org
Thu Oct 8 18:16:47 CEST 2020

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:31 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 5:54 PM Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 7:41 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:
> >> As far as allegations of abuse are concerned, I think it was already
> established that they are without merit – it did not happen in this AHG.
> > First "it" is somewhat reductionist, as best I can figure there are
> quite a number of allegations, some of them clearly about this that
> happened in this AHG.
> > Secondly, I don't think anything has been "established", only
> "asserted". That's a big difference.
> Fair enough. The allegations of potential wrongdoing have been made, a
> request for submitting specific complaints and facts that support multiple
> allegations to a higher authority has, so far, remained unanswered.

What are you talking about? More fabricated "facts".

I first asked you on July 5th to tell me how to file a complaint. You
refused it. Wasn't until September that you gave me Young's name. And I
submitted my complaint to him. He has not asked me for further
documentation. You are just fabricating "facts" to confuse everybody.

> No official conclusions have been reached - therefore, I am not going to
> comment on any of this as parts of ongoing investigation in the AHG report.
> These matters are now in the SC29/WG3 hands, not in this AHG.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20201008/d87171e0/attachment.html>

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list