[MPEG-OTSPEC] Co-existence of glyph rendering source types
Dave Crossland
dcrossland at google.com
Sat Sep 12 12:13:34 CEST 2020
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020, 4:19 AM Simon Cozens <simon at simon-cozens.org> wrote:
>
> One interesting fact is that MSOT did not carry over the bhed table from
> TrueType, and as Peter mentions in the github thread referenced above,
> the TT spec explicitly refers to "sfnt-housed fonts" with only bitmap
> glyph representation formats as *not* conformant TrueType fonts. If this
> logic carries over then Noto Color Emoji is not a conformant OFF font.
>
Isn't that logic from the 80s when TT fonts were disrupting the then
dominant bitmap font formats?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200912/96297173/attachment.html>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list