[MPEG-OTSPEC] Proposal to discontinue the AdHoc Group

[Dave Crossland]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:18 AM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

> On Monday, September 21, 2020 2:39 AM Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:41 PM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
> Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:
>
> Behdad,
>
>
>
> Asking the ISO/IEC SC29 Working Group
>
> > to acknowledge that the AdHoc model has NOT worked for many in the
> industry
>
> is a strong request, one that cannot be made without providing any
> substance to support it.
>
>
>
> Great. Where can I submit the evidence? My allegations involve you, Peter,
> Sairus, and Greg. So the party hearing my complaints cannot include any of
> you four because conflict of interest.
>
>
>
> Fascinating! So you seem to have made an attempt to redefine the concept
> of a “fair trial” where people you accuse of hypothetical / ephemeral
> wrongdoing [without any evidence to support it] CANNOT face the accuser, is
> that right?
>

No, I don't think that is quite right - Behdad saying "the party hearing my
complaints" is saying the judge-like roles should be independent of the
accuser/accused roles, not that the accused can not hear the complaints.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200921/d62e2f3d/attachment-0001.html>