[MPEG-OTSPEC] Proposal to discontinue the AdHoc Group

[Behdad Esfahbod]

I don't know who you are talking to Vlad, but OFF is neither your house nor
Microsoft's, figuratively or not.

behdad
http://behdad.org/


On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 9:33 AM Levantovsky, Vladimir <
Vladimir.Levantovsky at monotype.com> wrote:

> On Monday, September 21, 2020 11:16 AM Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:53 AM Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:10 AM Dave Crossland <dcrossland at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> So, I see no reason to discontinue the AHG while the possibility that it
> can be reformed is so clear.
>
>
>
> "Is so clear".. as in, the chair continues to completely deny that there
> is any problem?
>
>
>
> Vlad did not deny there is a problem. He asked for you to provide more
> substance.
>
>
>
> I'm waiting :)
>
>
>
> And I repeatedly asked for evidence – any evidence! Including the evidence
> that there is a problem, because from your multiple emails it appears that
> the existing ISO process is a problem. When it comes to work of this AHG –
> anyone can make a proposal in this group, and anyone can object to that
> proposal – show me (don’t tell me, show me!) how this process failed, at
> least once! I am still waiting.
>
>
>
> Using your own analogy about being invited into someone’s house and
> complaining of the host not sharing their best wine with you – you’re
> behaving like you’ve been invited to a dinner party that served your
> favorite dish, yet you’re complaining that their cooking process isn’t to
> your liking and that you could’ve cooked it better. J
>
>
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20200921/1b4e60b9/attachment.html>