[MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review
Chris Lilley
chris at w3.org
Mon Jan 11 15:45:42 CET 2021
Good call, that is much clearer.
On 2021-01-09 09:34, Peter Constable wrote:
>
> Vlad:
>
> Another late comment—something to consider in the WG discussion: While
> re-reading the draft text for 5.7.11.1.6, there are references to
> “source in” and “source out” compositing modes that aren’t set apart
> typographically, and that makes the wording a bit confusing. For
> example, “The same effects can be implemented… by… selecting the
> source in composite mode.”
>
> In the proposed WD content in the Google Fonts repo, I’ve made changes
> to the typography so that the compositing mode names are always
> italicized and follow the capitalization in the W3C doc; this makes
> the meaning in the text clearer. The above example becomes, “… by…
> selecting the /Source In /composite mode.” You can see the specific
> changes in this commit:
>
> https://github.com/googlefonts/colr-gradients-spec/commit/2938cb91372f4bfbd2460139131f09bcf9687be3#diff-f8c59e8d70f0a695574ea35269cf5f70c46db8cc40daa2d5e128e8c79be10528
> <https://github.com/googlefonts/colr-gradients-spec/commit/2938cb91372f4bfbd2460139131f09bcf9687be3#diff-f8c59e8d70f0a695574ea35269cf5f70c46db8cc40daa2d5e128e8c79be10528>
>
> Peter
>
> *From:* mpeg-otspec <mpeg-otspec-bounces at lists.aau.at> *On Behalf Of
> *Vladimir Levantovsky
> *Sent:* Friday, January 8, 2021 2:40 PM
> *To:* 'MPEG OT Spec list' <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>
> *Subject:* Re: [MPEG-OTSPEC] Draft AHG report for your review
>
> Folks,
>
> I have not received any responses / comments on the draft AHG report –
> it will be presented as is.
>
> Also, for the next week’s breakout session on Font Format work – so
> far I’ve got the following topics we need to cover to finalize the
> text of the amendment:
>
> * In 5.7.11.1.2.1 Color Lines: when it comes to color interpolation,
> currently the spec says that color values along the color line are
> linearly interpolated – is this enough?
> * In 5.7.11.1.2.2 Linear Gradients: the description of the gradient
> and rotation vectors, and effects the rotation vector has on the
> final results are underspecified. Issues that need additional
> clarifications include
> a) rotation effect on color interpolation results if the angular
> distance between gradient orientation vector and rotation vector
> are more than 90 degrees in either direction (CW or CCW), and
> b) what effect , if any, the magnitude of the rotation vector has.
> (Currently, the spec is silent about it.)
> * In 5.7.11.1.2.3 Radial Gradients: what is the expected behavior in
> case where both circles overlap with r > 0?
> * In 5.7.11.1.2.3 Radial Gradients: specify the expected behavior in
> case where a transform flattens both circles and their centers to
> a line.
> * In 5.7.11.4 COLR table and OFF font variations – discuss and
> incorporate the proposed changes
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgooglefonts%2Fcolr-gradients-spec%2Fcommit%2F9cfbcaefc88f487b547431b62dfab22ee743d9b8%3Fshort_path%3Df8c59e8%23diff-f8c59e8d70f0a695574ea35269cf5f70c46db8cc40daa2d5e128e8c79be10528&data=04%7C01%7C%7C78bfaa9cdc704f11c56808d8b4265b9d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637457424142250657%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Zn4ENHOcALtXtMvURnSMQKg%2FgLBbShw4dVNhJLRJ5jo%3D&reserved=0>
> in the last two paragraphs.
>
> If anything is missing from this list, please let me know.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vladimir
>
> *From:* Vladimir Levantovsky [mailto:vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com
> <mailto:vladimir.levantovsky at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:47 PM
> *To:* 'MPEG OT Spec list' <mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
> <mailto:mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at>>
> *Subject:* Draft AHG report for your review
> *Importance:* High
>
> Dear all,
>
> Please see attached the draft of the AHG report that I will present at
> the upcoming MPEG Systems (SC29/WG3) meeting next week (Jan. 11 – 15).
> Your comments are appreciated.
>
> We do have a number of open issues that need to be resolved in order
> to finalize COLR v1 specification – it would be best if these issues
> are resolved by next week, and discussed as part of the Font Format
> break-out group session during the WG meeting. Currently, this
> break-out session is tentatively scheduled on January 13 at 21:00 UTC.
> We will be using one of the available ISO Zoom rooms; however, the
> meeting access information will only be available to WG members and
> cannot be shared publicly.
>
> I would like to bring your attention to the specific part of the AHG
> Recommendations section where a promotion of the current Working Draft
> to the next PDAM stage is suggested (last paragraph, also
> highlighted). The final outcome related to document promotion will
> likely be determined based on the results of the WG discussions. Our
> possible options are to either keep the document as the Working Draft
> and finalize all remaining issues before the next WG meeting in early
> April, or to recommend promoting the document to the next PDAM stage,
> and address the remaining _/minor/_ issues as part of the ballot
> comments. I’d like to remind you that in order to be able to process
> the ballot in time for the next meeting, it will likely be published
> as two-months ballot, and the time period for submission of comments
> will be very short (most National Bodies require comments to be
> submitted at least three weeks prior to ballot closing date).
>
> Please respond to this email with any proposed changes and corrections
> to the AHG report by the end of day Friday, Jan. 8^th – No comments
> will be interpreted as approval!
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vladimir
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpeg-otspec mailing list
> mpeg-otspec at lists.aau.at
> https://lists.aau.at/mailman/listinfo/mpeg-otspec
--
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director @ W3C
W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20210111/25ac41e4/attachment.html>
More information about the mpeg-otspec
mailing list