[MPEG-OTSPEC] revised B64K glyf table: new tag "LOCX" and "GLYX"

[Liam R. E. Quin]

On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 02:29 +0000, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> 
> That said, how about LOC2 / GLY2? If they are related to loca and
> glyf ? And if that's the case, why aren't they done in a new/expanded
> version of those?

I think the draft that i posted has a comment in it to the effect that
using gly2 or GLY2 rather than GLYF might be better for this reason,
and asking for feedback.

It’s not a big deal either way.

For sure i agree about possible confusion. Thank you both for writing.

If the overall direction and proposal is accepted, we can discuss what
names to use, for sure.

Thanks,

liam

-- 
Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/
Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/
XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting.
Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations:  http://www.fromoldbooks.org