[MPEG-OTSPEC] Note on VARC conditions and condition set negation

Skef Iterum skef at skef.org
Thu Apr 11 23:46:17 CEST 2024


I understand, but there are reasons the processes discourage this
sort of thing. It's not just pro-forma.

Put this this way: Suppose this is added to the draft that was tentatively
approved on Tuesday, and then at the working group meeting someone
says "this is a significant change and we never discussed it, I no longer
approve of this proposal". Then is there even an opportunity to pull it
out, given that the documents are already registered and uploaded?
Is it worth the risk of losing the other changes?

Skef

On 4/11/24 14:23, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 13:40 -0700, Skef Iterum via mpeg-otspec wrote:
>> This direction would be fine with me if it's fine with the group, but
>> I feel that would a discussion for the upcoming, more onerous phase
>> of work, not to squeeze in before the up coming deadline.
> Note that if it's squeezed in and then there are comments saying there
> are problems with it, it can be squeezed out. Much more easily than
> squeezing it in later :-)
>
> liam
>


More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list