[mpeg-OTspec] AHG Kick-off

suzuki toshiya mpsuzuki at hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Sat Feb 18 02:26:40 CET 2012

I'm not sure whether SC29 has a special convention, but when I've
participated a development of an JTC1 spec in SC34, the convenor
told me that JTC1 has no convention giving a free-charged copy for
the editor.

By the way, it should be discussed if it is possible for this AHG
to develop a schema for ISO/IEC 14496-28 and distribute it freely,
or such free schema should not be produced as "by SC29/WG11 Font AHG".


James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "LV" == Levantovsky, Vladimir <vladimir.levantovsky at monotypeimaging.com> writes:
> LV> I am afraid the copy of the standard can only be obtained via ISO Web Store
> If those who participated in creating a spec cannot get a copy of it w/o
> wasting cash (for which at least some of us have zero budget), then the
> iso lacks any value as a standards organization.
> The last draft of the composite font format posted here, before things
> went off list, was far from ready for publication.  One would at the
> very least like to know whether any of the issues I wrote about were
> addressed.  (Especially sub-font naming.  Specifying subfonts only by
> postscript name, as I previously wrote, makes implementation impossible
> on current fontconfig-based systems.)
> -JimC

More information about the mpeg-otspec mailing list