[mpeg-OTspec] Final draft - AHG input contribution - REVIEW NEEDED (was: Clarification of some aspect of opentype SVG spec) [1 Attachment]

[Bob Hallissy]

On 2016-02-16 at 09:36 'Levantovsky, Vladimir' wrote:
> Please review and respond with your comments.

In the "Application interface" paragraph for the revised 
init/fina/medi/isol descriptions, the wording is revised from what John 
originally wrote, and I'm not sure the revision is correct. For example, 
the "Application interface" paragraph for "fina" ends by saying:

> For GIDs with single-joining final forms found in the ‘fina’ coverage 
> table, the application passes a GID to the feature and gets back a new 
> GID.
>

The problem with this wording is that single-joining final forms won't 
be /found in the 'fina' //coverage /table. Rather, for those isolates 
that have final forms it is the /isolate form glyphs/ that will be in 
the coverage table and it is the purpose of the 'fina' feature to 
replace the isolate with the final form.

Similarly for the other lookups (though perhaps one could get away with 
this wording for the 'isol' feature).

Bob







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.aau.at/pipermail/mpeg-otspec/attachments/20160216/81b45c2d/attachment.html>